Research Matters 36

Contents

  • Research Matters 36 - Foreword

    Oates, T. (2023). Foreword. Research Matters: A Cambridge University Press & Assessment publication, 36, 4.

    “…Education will never be the same again, post-pandemic…” is one view. “Back to normal…” is another. Neither position captures the reality of what we experienced and what we now see. For sure, following the wide and accelerated adoption of digital learning during the pandemic we need to understand and implement best practice in hybrid learning. We must understand this massive natural experiment in educational innovation, ensuring that we can regain the progress in closing gaps which we saw prior to COVID.

    Download

  • Research Matters 36 - Editorial

    Bramley, T. (2023). Editorial. Research Matters: A Cambridge University Press & Assessment publication, 36, 5.

    Our first article traces the record of assessments in natural history and related subjects (e.g., Botany, Zoology, Environmental Science) from the Cambridge University Press & Assessment archives. Our second article explores the effect of the reforms to GCSE Mathematics in England on progression to, and achievement in, post-16 mathematics. Our third article reports on the practical application of work on error in assessment materials in terms of redesigned checklists used in OCR for different professional roles in the question paper production process. Our fourth article looks at the relationship between the Cambridge Checkpoint tests taken at the end of lower secondary (around age 14) in some international schools, and subsequent performance on the Cambridge IGCSE (taken at around age 16). Our fifth article presents an analysis of the challenges of “synchronous hybrid teaching” based on in-depth interviews with 12 teachers from six different European countries.

    Download

  • The prevalence and relevance of Natural History assessments in the school curriculum, 1858–2000

    Cooke, G. (2023). The prevalence and relevance of Natural History assessments in the school curriculum, 1858–2000: A study of the Assessment Archives. Research Matters: A Cambridge University Press & Assessment publication, 36, 6-24. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.101742

    Natural History has been part of our curriculum since 1858. Not as a single, continuous subject but embedded in many different subjects and qualifications. As OCR prepares to launch a GCSE in Natural History, this article draws on the historical resources of OCR and its predecessor the University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate to show the range of natural history type subjects available to students, focusing on those for 16-year-olds. Referencing primary sources available from the Assessment Archives spanning the period from 1858 to 2000, this study reveals some of the qualifications available, as well as the scope and popularity of these subjects and the challenges faced by all those involved.

    Download

  • The impact of GCSE maths reform on progression to mathematics post-16

    Vidal Rodeiro, C., & Williamson, J. (2023). The impact of GCSE Maths reform on progression to mathematics post-16 Research Matters: A Cambridge University Press & Assessment publication, 36, 25-45. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.101743

    In England, GCSE (General Certificate of Secondary Education) qualifications offered to students aged 14–16 were recently reformed. For mathematics specifically, the new GCSE aimed to be more demanding, provide greater challenge for the most able students, and support progression to post-16 mathematics. However, there have been concerns that the new GCSE could deter students from further education in the subject and, to date, there has been little research on its impact on participation in and learning of mathematics post-16.

    This research compared progression to and performance in post-16 mathematics pre- and post-GCSE reform and found that, contrary to fears about reduced uptake, progression generally increased following the reform. In particular, the increase was higher among those who achieved top grades in their mathematics GCSE than for students with just a pass. Performance in post-16 mathematics was, in contrast to teacher expectations, lower post-reform.

    Download

  • An example of redeveloping checklists to support assessors who check draft exam papers for errors

    Vitello, S., Crisp, V., & Ireland, J. (2023). An example of redeveloping checklists to support assessors who check draft exam papers for errors Research Matters: A Cambridge University Press & Assessment publication, 36, 46-58. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.101744

    Assessment materials must be checked for errors before they are presented to candidates. Any errors have the potential to reduce validity. For example, in the most extreme cases, an error may turn an otherwise well-designed exam question into one that is impossible to answer. In Cambridge University Press & Assessment, assessment materials are checked by multiple assessment specialists across different stages during assessment development. While human checkers are critical to this process, we must acknowledge that there is ample research showing the shortcomings of being human (e.g., we have cognitive biases, and memory and attentional limitations). It is important to provide assessment checkers with tools that help overcome or mitigate these limitations.

    This article is about one type of checking tool – checklists. We describe a research-informed, collaborative project to support assessors in performing their checks of exam papers. This project focused on redesigning the instructional, training and task materials provided to assessors. A key part of this was to design checklists for assessors to use when performing their checks. In this article, we focus primarily on the approach that we took for these checklists in order to draw readers’ attention to the complexity that is involved in designing them and to provide a practical example of how research can be used strategically to inform key design decisions.

    Download

  • An analysis of the relationship between Secondary Checkpoint and IGCSE results

    Gill, T. (2023). An analysis of the relationship between Secondary Checkpoint and IGCSE results Research Matters: A Cambridge University Press & Assessment publication, 36, 59-74. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.101745

    Secondary Checkpoint assessments are taken by students at the end of the Cambridge Lower Secondary programme (aged 14) in countries around the world. Many students continue with Cambridge after this and take IGCSE exams two years later.

    Given that there is a high level of coherence between the curricula in the two stages, performance in Secondary Checkpoint should be a good indicator of performance at IGCSE.

    In this article, I investigate whether there is evidence to support this contention, by calculating correlations between Checkpoint scores and IGCSE grades, across a range of subjects. I also look at whether students in schools offering the Cambridge Lower Secondary programme go on to perform better at IGCSE than schools not offering the programme.

    Download

  • Synchronous hybrid teaching: how easy is it for schools to implement?

    Constantinou, F. (2023). Synchronous hybrid teaching: how easy is it for schools to implement? Research Matters: A Cambridge University Press & Assessment publication, 36, 75–87. https://doi.org/10.17863/CAM.101746

    ‘Synchronous hybrid teaching’ (SHT), defined as the concurrent delivery of online and in-person teaching, is an instructional mode employed by many schools during the COVID-19 pandemic to minimise learning loss for students who had to self-isolate at home. Since then, there have been calls for SHT to be retained as an instructional strategy post-pandemic to enable students who would otherwise miss school (e.g., students with certain mobility issues, health conditions and/or family circumstances) to still attend classes. To explore the feasibility of this proposal, this qualitative study drew upon the SHT experiences of primary and secondary teachers in different parts of Europe. The findings indicate that SHT is a demanding mode of instruction, one involving four different types of challenges: co-ordination challenges, administrative challenges, interaction challenges, and engagement challenges. More importantly, they demonstrate that SHT can struggle to consistently provide on-site and remote students with comparable learning opportunities and experiences. Through exposing the challenges involved in SHT, the study identifies directions for improving the quality of SHT in the future. It also calls for SHT employed during the pandemic to be referred to as ‘emergency SHT’ rather than merely as ‘SHT’.

    Download

  • Research Matters issue 36 - Research News

    Bowett, L. (2023). Research News. Research Matters: A Cambridge University Press & Assessment publication, 36, 88-90.

    A summary of recent conferences, reports, blogs and research articles published since the last issue of Research Matters.

    Download

Data Bytes

A regular series of graphics from our research team, highlighting the latest research findings and trends in education and assessment.